TwitterLinkedinWhatsAppTelegramTelegram
2
2
Read this article in:

Laboratory diagnostics: Edema disease

2 comments

What laboratory diagnostic methods can I use to diagnose Edema disease? Which one should I choose according to the situation? How do I interpret the results?

Assays available

Bacterial culture

  • Isolation of live organism
  • Sample types: feces, intestinal content
  • Pros:
    • Bacteria is easy to grow in 1 day
    • Easy to do in any lab (including in-house)
    • Relative low cost
  • Cons:
    • Some E. coli are part of normal intestinal flora
    • Pigs have multiple E. coli at same time
    • Pigs previously treated with antibiotics can prevent bacterial growth

Antimicrobial susceptibility

  • Tests in vitro ability of live organism to grow under specific concentrations of different antimicrobials
  • Sample types: feces, intestinal content
  • Pros:
    • Identification of susceptibility or resistance of specific isolate to common antimicrobials
    • Identification of antimicrobial resistance trends
  • Cons:
    • Requires a bacterial isolate
    • In vitro testing may be slightly different than in vivo results
    • Some specific antimicrobials may not be tested or require separate, special testing
    • Moderate cost

Histopathology

  • Evaluates the presence of tissue lesions (damage) which can confirm the presence of disease. Sometimes can also detect the presence of organisms directly (bacteria and parasites) or indirectly (virus) through additional special staining.
  • Sample types: tissue
  • Pros:
    • Associate bacterial adhesion with intestinal damage
    • No special staining needed
  • Cons:
    • Need to formalin-fix intestinal tissues within <15 min of pig death -Intestinal tissue decomposes quickly
    • Disease can be segmental so multiple intestinal samples should be submitted

Genotyping

  • A polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique that detects presence of specific sequence of nucleic acids (DNA) associated with known virulence genes.
  • Pros:
    • Done via PCR; easy to do
    • Helps identify pathogenicity by detecting presence of genes (not necessarily expression of genes) associated with virulence factors
      • Toxin Genes: EAST1, LT, STa, STb, Stx1, Stx2, Stx2e
      • Pilus Genes: F18, F41, K88 (F4), K99 (F5), 987P (F6)
      • Adhesin Genes: AIDA, EAEA, PAA
    • Helps with proper vaccine selection (matching correct pili)
    • Helps confirm isolate has genes for edema disease

E. coli genes detected through PCR genotyping and their function. Genes highlighted in red are important in helping diagnose edema disease.

Gene Type Description
EAST1 Toxin Intestinal toxin binds to the same receptor and stimulates the same secretory pathway as Sta (causation of diarrhea is not well established)
LT Toxin Intestinal toxin that stimulates intestinal secretion
STa Toxin Intestinal toxin that stimulates intestinal secretion mostly in young pigs (decreases absorption of water an electrolytes)
STb Toxin Intestinal toxin stimulating secretory diarrhea mostly in older pigs (increases secretion from enterocytes)
Stx1 Toxin Intestinal toxin can be found in pathogenic and non-pathogenic strains
Stx2 Toxin Intestinal toxin can be found in pathogenic and non-pathogenic strains
Stx2e Toxin Systemic toxin which induces vascular damage and edema disease
F18 (F107) Adhesin Pili (fimbria) used for attachment which is present after 20 days of age and commonly associated with post weaning scours and edema disease
F41 Adhesin Pili (fimbria) used for attachment mostly neonates
K88 (F4) Adhesin Pili (fimbria) used for attachment birth through all ages
K99 (F5) Adhesin Pili (fimbria) used for attachment mostly neonates
987P (F6) Adhesin Pili (fimbria) used for attachment mostly neonates
AIDA Adhesin Nonfimbrial "adhesin-involved-in-diffuse-adherence" more commonly found in conjunction with F18
EAE Adhesin Nonfimbrial adhesin that contributes to "attaching-and-effacing" lesions
PAA Adhesin Nonfimbrial adhesin essential for producing "attaching-and-effacing" lesions
  • Cons:
    • Requires a bacterial isolate
    • Hope the correct isolate is genotyped (pigs can have several isolates at the same time)
    • Moderate price, but usually only test 1 isolate

Result interpretation:

Bacterial culture:

  • Must be a haemolytic E. coli
    Figure 1. Pure culture of haemolytic E. coli on a blood agar plate.&nbsp; Note the clear zone around each bacterial colony indicating hemolysis (breaking down of blood in plate agar). Photo Credits: Iowa State University, Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Bacteriology Section
    Figure 1. Pure culture of haemolytic E. coli on a blood agar plate.  Note the clear zone around each bacterial colony indicating hemolysis (breaking down of blood in plate agar). Photo Credits: Iowa State University, Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Bacteriology Section
  • Purity:
    • Pure growth: highly suggestive of disease contributor
    • Mixed growth: questionable value
  • Amount:
    • High: highly suggestive of disease contributor
    • Moderate: variable interpretation
    • Low: questionable value (could be contaminant)
    • No growth: Animal possibly previously treated with antibiotics or not significant contributor

Antimicrobial susceptibility:

  • Susceptible: possible good choice for treatment if antimicrobial can reach target tissue
  • Resistant: select different antimicrobial
  • MIC: if MICs are done ensure antimicrobial selected achieves the listed MIC value in the target organ

Histopathology:

  • Positive: Strong association with accusation if able to demonstrate intestinal lesions with E. coli adhered to epithelial cells
  • Negative: No intestinal lesions

Genotyping:

  • Genotyping is necessary to confirm isolate has necessary virulence factors associated with edema disease
    • Must be either F4 or F18
    • Must have shiga-like toxin (Stx2e)

Scenario


Pigs with post-weaning scours:

  • Collect rectal swabs from 2 or more untreated scouring pigs and submit for bacterial culture, antimicrobial susceptibility, and genotyping.
  • Euthanize 1-3 untreated scouring pigs. Immediately collect and place in formalin solution 3 intestinal samples from each piglet. Collect fresh intestinal samples to submit chilled for bacterial culture, antimicrobial susceptibility, and genotyping.

See the "Disease manual" for more information

Edema diseaseThe Edema disease happens during the weaning period and it is characterized by a E. coli K88 (F4) or F18 producing a very strong vascular toxin inducing sudden death, edema and/or nervous signs.

Article Comments

This area is not intended to be a place to consult authors about their articles, but rather a place for open discussion among pig333.com users.
22-Apr-2021 Friederike SchmelzFrom our experience we see in around 10 to 20% of the bact exam non hemolytic strains but in the multiplex PCR positive for Stx2e and sometimes positive for F18 as well, from farms with ED clinic,
nice to read: https://www.shigatoxin.com/assets/res/literature/Gotter_Diagnosing_edema_disease_2017.pdf
30-Apr-2021 ewjIt is good to include the brain in histopathology of edema disease. There are specific lesions in the vasculature of the brain (vasculitis, and extravasated protein around the vessel) that can support the diagnosis. We have seen variant strains causing unusual edema disease with bleb-like mesenteric edema in China. Some of those dont have the common virulence/adhesion factors. Euthanasia of pigs for diagnosis rather than reliance on rectal swabs is worth the trouble and expense, not just because it opens up more diagnostic opportunity. We have demostrated that the dominant E. coli in feces may not be the same E. coli that is adhering in the jejunum and wreaking havoc.
Leave a new Comment

Access restricted to 333 users. In order to post a comment you must be logged in.

Related articles

The autopsy of ETEC diarrhoea cases usually shows dilated, congested thin small intestine loops filled with the watery yellow diarrhoea

Escherichia coli infections in pigs (2 of 2)

Post-weaning colibacillosis and oedema disease are common global infection among farmed pigs – these strains of E coli appear to be "embedded" in most pig farms, so elimination is not a current option. Vaccination of sows or gilts with ETEC vaccines has no effect on post-weaning E. coli infections.