Read this article in:

Report finds international variation in AMR policies

The present report presents an overview and analysis of the responses received from non- EU countries to a questionnaire from the European Commission's Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety on national policies and measures taken in these non-EU countries to combat the development of AMR in the human and animal areas.

Monday 9 July 2018 (1 years 3 months 10 days ago)
Like

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a serious threat to human and animal health and a significant social and economic burden, both in the EU and globally. The European Commission sent a questionnaire to non-EU countries concerning their national policies and measures to address AMR

The questionnaire was sent by the Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety (Health and food audits and analysis Directorate) to the 128 EU Delegations attached to non-EU countries 7 in December 2016, with a request for the questionnaire to be further distributed to the relevant national human health and veterinary competent authorities for AMR in those countries.

The responses received have been analysed in an anonymised way in this report, which presents an interesting overview of measures taken around the world to address the important challenge posed by AMR, both in human and veterinary medicine. This action is in line with the EU One Health Action Plan against AMR, which aims for stronger cooperation with international organisations and countries worldwide.

Prudent use of antimicrobials in animals

Question: Have any national policies or guidelines been developed in your country concerning the prudent use of antimicrobials in animals?

Of the 71 countries responding to this question, 48 stated that they have not developed any national policies or guidelines regarding the prudent use of antimicrobials in animals, while 23 countries stated they have such national policies or guidelines in place. As presented in Figure 1, there are differences between the geographical regions. Aside from the North American region (1 response), the highest percentage of respondent countries that have developed policies on prudent use in animals comes from East Asia & Pacific (50 %). The vast proportion of respondents from Middle East & North Africa (86 %) and Sub-Saharan Africa (79 %) do not have any policies or guidelines on the prudent use of antimicrobials in animals. Additionally, among the respondent countries from South Asia (2), none has developed policies or guidelines on the prudent use of antimicrobials in animals.

Policies and guidelines on prudent use of antimicrobials in animals – region
Policies and guidelines on prudent use of antimicrobials in animals – region

Tuesday May 31, 2018/ EFSA/ European Union.
http://ec.europa.eu/food

See more articles related to this article

Swine news

Italy: "ClassyFarm"; classifying the risk on pig farms10-Jul-2018 1 years 3 months 9 days ago

News from Pig health

Article Comments

This area is not intended to be a place to consult authors about their articles, but rather a place for open discussion among pig333.com users.
Leave a new Comment

Access restricted to 333 users. In order to post a comment you must be logged in.

Not a registered user of 333?sign upand access swine prices, the search engine, ...
It is fast and free
Are you registered in 333?LOGINIf you've forgotten your password we'll send it to you here

tags

Swine News

Swine industry news in your email

You are not subscribed to this list

18-Oct-201911-Oct-201904-Oct-201927-Sep-2019

Log in and sign up on the list

Not a registered user of 333?sign upand access swine prices, the search engine, ...
It is fast and free
Are you registered in 333?LOGINIf you've forgotten your password we'll send it to you here