TwitterLinkedinWhatsAppTelegramTelegram
0

Evaluation of glycerol, a biodiesel coproduct, in grow-finish pig diets to support growth and pork quality

8% crude glycerol can be added to the diet and used as an effective alternative energy source to partially replace corn.

28 April 2011
TwitterLinkedinWhatsAppTelegramTelegram
0

The hypothesis was that dietary crude glycerol would influence quality of pork and that duration of glycerol feeding may alter this response. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to determine the effects of long-term and short-term feeding of crude glycerol on growth performance, carcass characteristics, and muscle and fat quality of grow-finish pigs. Crossbred pigs (n = 216; BW = 31.3 ± 1.8 kg) were blocked by initial BW, and pens within blocks were assigned randomly to 1 of 3 dietary treatments (24 pens; 9 pigs/pen). Dietary treatments were control, a corn-soybean meal-based diet (CON); long-term, CON + 8% glycerol fed throughout the experiment (LT); and short-term, pigs fed CON for the first 6 wk followed by CON + 8% glycerol fed during the last 8 wk of the experiment (ShT).

Pigs fed LT had greater (P < 0.05) ADG, whereas pigs fed ShT tended (P < 0.10) to grow faster than CON. Pigs assigned to LT had greater (P < 0.05) average daily feed intake (ADFI) compared with CON, whereas ShT-fed pigs had similar ADFI to CON. Gain:feed tended (P < 0.10) to be greater for CON- and ShT-fed pigs compared with LT-fed pigs. Hot carcass weight was greater (P < 0.05) for LT-fed pigs compared with CON, whereas ShT-fed pigs had HCW similar to both LT- and CON-fed pigs. Dressing percentage of CON-fed pigs was similar to both LT- and ShT-fed pigs, but LT-fed pigs tended to have greater (P = 0.06) dressing percentage than ShT-fed pigs. Tenth-rib backfat (P = 0.26) and LM area (P = 0.17) were not affected by dietary treatment. There was a trend (P < 0.10) for LT-fed pigs to have a smaller fat-free lean percentage than CON-fed pigs. Short-term glycerol feeding increased (P < 0.05) belly firmness compared with CON and had similar belly firmness compared with LT-fed pigs. Dietary treatment had no effect (P > 0.60) on pork quality of loins based on taste panel assessments.

Feeding pigs 8% crude glycerol throughout the grow-finish period resulted in a 3% improvement in growth rate and a 2% depression in BW gain efficiency compared with CON diets. Grow-finish pigs fed diets containing 8% crude glycerol during the last 8 wk before slaughter achieved growth performance similar to pigs fed CON diets. Effects of crude glycerol on carcass traits seem to be limited to improvements in belly firmness with short-term feeding of glycerol.

SJ Schieck, GC Shurson, BJ Kerr and LJ Johnston, 2010. Journal of Animal Science, 88:3927-3935. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2010-2858

Article Comments

This area is not intended to be a place to consult authors about their articles, but rather a place for open discussion among pig333.com users.
Leave a new Comment

Access restricted to 333 users. In order to post a comment you must be logged in.

You are not subscribed to this list pig333.com in 3 minutes

Weekly newsletter with all the pig333.com updates

Log in and sign up on the list

Related articles

Glycerol and swine feeding

Glycerol is a byproduct of the industry of bio-diesel fuels, representing roughly 10% of the crude oil used for that purpose. Therefore, large quantities are expected to be available in the near future for the different markets that can have a potential interest for it.
You are not subscribed to this list Swine News

Swine industry news in your email

Log in and sign up on the list