Effects of creep diet complexity on individual consumption characteristics and growth performance of neonatal and weanling pigs

The use of a complex creep diet may improve piglet performance during lactation and the number of pigs that consume creep feed
Monday 8 February 2010 (8 years 11 months 10 days ago)
The objectives of the present study were to determine (1) the effects of creep diet complexity on preweaning performance and the proportion of piglets consuming creep feed (Exp. 1) and (2) whether social facilitation occurs between eaters of creep feed and pigs that did not consume or had not been offered creep feed in a commercial nursery (Exp. 2).

In Exp. 1, 96 sows and their litters were used to determine the effects of creep diet complexity on preweaning performance and the proportion of piglets consuming creep feed. The experimental treatments were: (1) no creep feed (n = 26), (2) simple creep diet (n = 26), and (3) complex creep diet (n = 44). Pigs fed the complex creep diet had greater (P < 0.03) ADG and tended to have greater (P < 0.06) total gain than pigs fed the simple creep diet, with no creep pigs intermediate. Litters fed the complex creep diet consumed twice the total (1.24 vs. 0.621 kg; P < 0.0006) and daily (0.413 vs. 0.200 kg; P < 0.0006) creep feed intake of litters fed the simple creep diet. The high-complexity creep diet improved (P < 0.0001) the proportion of eaters from 28% to 68%. A greater (P < 0.10) proportion of eaters were nursing in the middle and posterior teats (57% and 52%, respectively) than in the anterior teats (38%).

In Exp. 2, 675 pigs from Exp. 1 (initial BW 6.37 kg and 21.2 ± 0.2 d) were used to determine whether social facilitation occurs between eaters and non-eaters in commercial nursery groups. The treatments were: non-eater group (pigs that were not provided any creep feed or non-eaters of creep feed), eater group (pigs that positively consumed creep feed), and mix group (pigs that were 51% non-eaters and 49% eaters). Each treatment had 25 pigs per pen and 9 replications (pens). In the initial 3 d postweaning, eaters had greater (P < 0.01) ADG and (P < 0.002) ADFI than non-eaters, with the mix group being intermediate. Overall ADG of the eater group was 6.2% higher (P < 0.05) than that of the non-eater group. For social facilitation to occur, weight gains of non-eaters in the mix pens should be either (1) closer to the weight gains of eaters in the mix pen or (2) greater than the weight gains of the non-eater group. Results showed that noneaters within the mix pens failed both criteria.

In conclusion, the high-complexity creep diet improved preweaning ADG, litter creep feed intake, and the proportion of eaters. Eaters had improved postweaning feed intake, daily gains, and weight uniformity and reduced postweaning lag. Mixing eaters with non-eaters within pens in large commercial groups did not stimulate feed intake and daily gains of non-eaters, which indicates that social facilitation did not occur.

RC Sulabo, MD Tokach, JR Bergstrom, JM DeRouchey, RD Goodband, SS Dritz, and JL Nelssen. 2009. Swine Day, Kansas State Univerity: 51-64.

Article Comments

This area is not intended to be a place to consult authors about their articles, but rather a place for open discussion among pig333.com users.
Leave a new Comment

Access restricted to 333 users. In order to post a comment you must be logged in.

Not a registered user of 333?sign upand access swine prices, the search engine, ...
It is fast and free
Are you registered in 333?LOGINIf you've forgotten your password we'll send it to you here