Diagnosis of Porcine Respiratory and Reproductive Syndrome

In reproductive disease, submission of several whole affected litters is advisable to provide material for diagnosis of PRRSV and other diseases causing reproductive or neonatal problems.
Monday 11 January 2010 (8 years 2 months 13 days ago)
Porcine Respiratory and Reproductive Syndrome (PRRSV), or blue ear disease, is caused by an RNA virus with a tendency to rapidly mutate, allowing a wide diversity of strains to develop which assists the virus to evade the pig population’s immunity to vaccine and field viruses. It infects pig’s immune cells and causes immunosuppression which is why PRRSV presents with a wide variety of clinical signs and, often, secondary infections.

Accurate diagnosis of disease when pigs are showing clinical signs suspicious of PRRSV is important to allow suitable control measures for both PRRSV and other diseases occurring at the same time. The methods used are discussed below.

Clinical signs: may mean that PRRSV is strongly suspected, further investigation is essential for a definite diagnosis to be made.

Non breeding pigs:
• wide variety and nonspecific signs; in laboratory submissions with PRRSV from 2003-2009 to the
Veterinary Laboratories Agency (VLA) in the UK, the four most common signs were respiratory, wasting, malaise and found dead.
• signs not readily distinguished from other common diseases of rearing pigs. PRRSV contributes to
the porcine respiratory disease complex (PRDC) and also increases the severity of other diseases on farm such as streptococcal meningitis.
• PRRSV often suspected where there is an upsurge in respiratory or other disease of unusual
severity, or which is not responding to antibiotic treatment as well as expected.
Reproductive disease:
• characterised by late abortions, stillbirths, weak neonates, variable piglet and litter sizes, increased preweaning mortality and irregular returns.
• litters may show evidence of sequential foetal death with mummies, stillbirths, weak live and viable piglets born to the same sow.
• sows and gilts may show few signs or transient inappetance, malaise and pyrexia, and occasionally deaths.
• coughing may occur, particularly in younger breeding pigs, such as replacement gilts.
• in association with the poor viability of piglets at birth and the effects of disease on sows’ milk supplies, preweaning mortality may increase with mixed and unusual causes of death.
• severity of disease very variable due to differences between virus strains, different levels of immunity in the pig herd (from vaccination or previous exposure) and herd specific factors affecting when pigs are infected and how the virus spreads within the herd.
• disease can be sufficiently severe to warrant reporting to the Animal Health Authorities if the signs are indistinguishable from notifiable diseases; classical swine fever and Aujezsky’s disease.

Clinical signs reported in growing pigs with PRRSV submitted to VLA 2003-2009

Post-mortem examination (PME) -
pigs for PME should be typical and early cases of disease submitted to the laboratory live (if welfare allows), or freshly dead, and ideally untreated. Chronic cases from hospital pens are unlikely to be useful. PME alone does not allow PRRSV to be diagnosed but is a good starting point in investigation because:
• allows pathology (disease processes) in the pig’s different organ systems to be assessed and provides excellent material for testing to diagnose, or rule out, PRRS.
• PRRSV commonly present with other diseases, PME allows full investigation of these.
In reproductive disease, submission of several whole affected litters is advisable to provide material for diagnosis of PRRSV and other diseases causing reproductive or neonatal problems. If available, fresh stillborn and weak neonates are more useful than decomposing aborted foetuses.

Progressive foetal death in a litter can be seen in PRRSV infection

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR): a very useful sensitive method of directly looking for PRRSV in the tissues or blood of a pig. Most methods distinguish Genotype 1 (European) and Genotype 2 (North American) PRRSV.
• A positive result indicates that the pig was actively infected with PRRSV at the time of sampling. Assuming that the pig was not recently vaccinated with live vaccine, this confirms that field PRRSV infection has occurred. On a unit which should be PRRSV-free this provides confirmation of PRRSV. However, as PRRSV is present in serum and tissues for an extended period (weeks), further investigation (IHC) is often undertaken to assess how much the PRRSV was contributing to disease, especially on units where PRRSV is known to be present.

• In foetal or neonatal tissue, a positive result is confirmation of PRRSV. A negative PCR result does not rule out PRRSV as the virus can infect the foetus and cause damage, but the virus may have gone by the time the piglet is delivered. It can be useful to perform PCR on serum from affected sows in reproductive disease, collecting blood from sows showing signs, not historical cases. This may also allow virus to be detected.
Immunohistochemistry (IHC): histopathology and lung IHC determine whether PRRS virus is causing lung damage by labelling the virus within lung tissue. It can be used alongside other tests to investigate the contribution of PRRSV to pneumonia relative to bacteria (Pasteurella multocida, Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, Haemophilus parasuis, Streptococcus suis), Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and other viruses (PCV2, swine influenza). This test is particularly useful in pigs which are vaccinated for PRRSV or pigs from herds where there is a known PRRSV challenge but infection has previously been controlled. It is essential that pigs are submitted early in disease and are not longstanding cases for this to be useful. Where pigs are PCR positive, and lung IHC negative, the presence of PRRSV is still of significance in sick pigs as it can be causing immunosuppression. It is not generally used for foetal tissues.

Pneumonia in 14 week old pig with PRRSV viraemia, PMWS and Pasteurella multocida infection; although PRRSV was not identified in lung by IHC it is likely to be exacerbating PCV2 disease in this pig.

Virus isolation (VI): This is where PRRS virus is cultured from serum or tissues. Since PCR was developed, it is not routinely used as it is expensive. VI is still useful where full virus characterisation is required in, for example, research studies and detailed epidemiological investigations e.g. possible vaccine failure, identifying source of infection.

Serology: detects antibodies to the virus and is an indirect way of seeing if pigs have been exposed to virus in the past. The main test used is the Idexx antibody ELISA and antibodies rise from about 7 days of infection. It is not possible to distinguish antibody to field virus from antibody to vaccine virus and serology on vaccinated pigs is of limited value. On units supposed to be free of PRRSV and unvaccinated, presence of antibodies confirms that there has been active infection with PRRSV in those pigs. However, it does not indicate the timing of infection. To do this, cohort or paired serology is used. In cohort serology, groups of pigs at different ages or stages of production are bled simultaneously giving a cross-sectional snapshot of the herd exposure to PRRSV. However, it is more accurate to do paired serology where the same pigs are bled twice; first in the first few days of infection and again 2-3 weeks later during recovery. If the pigs change from being antibody negative to positive, this indicates that PRRSV infection occurred during the period of disease. In reproductive disease, sows have often already developed antibody by the time they show signs of disease. Serology is not the recommended method of diagnosing PRRSV but is useful in herds previously PRRSV-free. Antibody detection in young piglets may be colostral and reflect their mother’s status. The ELISA detects antibody to both Genotype 1 (European) and Genotype 2 (North American) PRRSV, the IPMA is the serological test which can distinguish these.

Article Comments

This area is not intended to be a place to consult authors about their articles, but rather a place for open discussion among pig333.com users.

Dr.Kedar Karki15-Sep-2011 (6 years 6 months 9 days ago)

very informatic

Access restricted to 333 users. In order to post a comment you must be logged in.

Not a registered user of 333?sign upand access swine prices, the search engine, ...
It is fast and free
Are you registered in 333?LOGINIf you've forgotten your password we'll send it to you here