Gitte Drejer

22-Oct-2020rtomixAlthough the control strategy above emphasise the bisecuriy measures as primary action and vaccination as supporting tool only (wich I totally agree), it's strange a little, that despite the publication lately reporting about the severe impact of a recombinant strain originated from 2 MLV strains widely used in Danmark (one of the current auther is co-auther there as well), and several publication proving the higher immunological reaction (Comparison of different vaccination schedules for sustaining the immune response against PRRSV , Diaz et al,2013, The Veterinary Journal) as well as at least same but sometimes even better clinical protection of killed vaccine alone or in prime-boost protocol (Comparison of productivity losses between swine breeding herds adopting killed or attenuated PRRS virus vaccination protocols following PRRS outbreak, Rawal 2020, ISU) , the authers here not even mention it as a possibly safer alternative.